nor should any politician if it comes to that, a debate on the pros of a in out vote of the eu should not be lead by any politician let alone carmoon there job is administer the will of the people not to be seen siding one way or another,why has a vote been complicated with negotiations before the vote, there s clearly a bias there which carmoon admits himself a better deal for the uk what exactly does he think hes going to come away with? does he really think that the fundamentals of the eu inshrined in its own laws can be altered, nothing can be changed within the eu with out all the members agreeing ,were as some would have you believe we have a fair vote, the reality is we have a tiny vote compaired with the rest of the eu states dominated by the french german pact, its unlikely camaroom will come away with anything meaning full without the total agreement of all the represented states immigration is the only card in the present climate that he could hope to win, which will alienate a big % of the stay in vote, the other card he wants which is related is control of are own courts without the threat of appeal to a higher court in the eu , this again would make a mockery of the eu if some how we were granted this without the other states following the same line, its one of the fundamentals of the eu, camaroom is playing for time, to what ends is very unclear, what is clear is es not campaigning on behalf of the people hes campaigning on behalf of his own ministers and business , his ministers for the reasons i have already given, business vs employment laws another thorn in the side of a conservative administration, business is quite capable of campaing on its own behalf , and so are the people who a concerned with employment rights,